BOMEX with the CPE SHOC parameters (Sep 2026)

Question. Do the machine-learning-calibrated SHOC parameter sets of Zhang et al. (2026, GRL, doi:10.1029/2025GL120241; "CPE" ranks 1-3, from Peter Bogenschutz) make E3SM/SHOC's BOMEX cumulus-like, i.e. a cloud fraction that peaks near cloud base and decays upward?

Answer: no. In the full-physics EAM-SCM (Brian's setup, radiation off) and in the SHOC standalone driver alike, in almost every one of the 4 dz x 4 dt combinations, the CPE sets have their cloud-fraction maximum in the upper part of the cloud layer and much more liquid water than default SHOC. The exception is dz = 50 m with dt ≤ 60 s, where the CPE cloud switches on and off (large swings in liquid water path) and its time-mean maximum sits low in the layer. Hours 4-6 means; the grey LES curves on the figures are a reference only.

Figure decks (same page order everywhere)

typedefault SHOCCPE-1CPE-2CPE-3reference
EAM-SCM (65 p.)defaultcpe1fixcpe2cpe3
SHOC standalone (59 p.)defaultcpe1cpe2cpe3Matheou (UConn) LES, 21 p.

cpe1fix = CPE rank 1 including shoc_c_diag_3rd_mom (Peter's C_diag_w3), which Brian's cpe1 runs omitted. The EAM-SCM groups use Brian's template and code (E3SM-fork eam_scm_bugfixes @ 4c07d90b57); CPE values enter only through user_nl_eam. Standalone runs: shoc_in_and_out driver, 12 h, dx = 100 km, same IC files as the SCM.

SHOC+MF

SHOC+MF results for BOMEX and DYCOMS-RF01, in the standalone driver and in the full-physics SCM, all with Cee = 1 and do_wthv_mf on, are on their own page: SHOCMF.

Data and scripts